UDL: Is The Universal design for Learning an Effective Strategy?

Here are my thoughts on UL.

In a PowerPoint created by The National Center on Universal Design for Learning, the quote, “Stop and reflect. Think of an example of how a learning context creates the illusion of disability” really thought provoking. How often do we frustrate ourselves when the students do not comprehend the material or appear to be less bright than their predecessors? It is possible that we are fabricating their weaknesses instead of diagnosing our approach. 

The UDL approach asks teachers to look at the needs of the children first. Reflect on the interest of the children, their specific learning needs and styles, and then begin the planning process. If teachers “think ahead,” then there will be fewer frustrating surprises during the delivery. 

With this information in mind, I can plan lessons with multiple presentations, different outlets of expression, and engagement activities that will reach all learners instead of a handful (pg 35 The National Center on Universal Design for Learning). Technology fits directly into this approach because there are countless ways to learn the same material. Also, technology is in the hands of our kids on a daily basis, so they find it relevant and exciting. Technology provides opportunities to build priceless background knowledge for all students.  Students do not have to research the same articles, we can find leveled one. Students who are non-readers can watch YouTube or listen to podcasts. Our visual learners will thrive on the media, and the visual-logical students can use videos and screen casts too. Also, there are Microsoft Accessibility tools such as text to talk, background limitations, and keyboard settings that could minimize distractions and maximize learning for special education and general education students.